<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dictatorship by Pelosi, Reid and Obama?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.usofearth.com/tp/?feed=rss2&#038;p=123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.usofearth.com/tp/?p=123</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:03:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ross Wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.usofearth.com/tp/?p=123&#038;cpage=1#comment-5836</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 21:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usofearth.com/tp/?p=123#comment-5836</guid>
		<description>Could Obama Be America’s First Defacto President?
 
Innocent Americans increasingly are sent to prison based on false evidence manufactured by police forensic crime labs. Now President Obama wants the power to incarcerate U.S. Citizens not on evidence, but for what they might do.    

Compare: Two days after the 1933 burning of Germany’s Parliament Building, blamed on communists, Hitler responded with a powerful speech before Parliament. Hitler asked Parliament to suspend sections of the Reich Constitution that protected Citizens&#039; Rights and Civil Liberties. Hitler said the suspension was necessary so government could protect the homeland from being destroyed by communists. Hitler promised Parliament the Constitution would later be restored. After Parliament passed Hitler’s Discriminatory Decrees and Hitler signed it February 28, 1933, Hitler immediately used the news laws to abolished Parliament. See Hitler’s 1933 Discriminatory Laws below:

Obama gave a speech in May 2010, that proposed incarcerating in indefinite prolonged detention without evidence, any person government deemed a “combatant” or likely to engage in a violent act in the future; that would include U.S. Citizens “without evidence of wrongdoing.” With that amount power Obama could like Hitler arrest members of Congress, drag U.S. Citizens off the street and from their homes to be imprisoned indefinitely based only on Government’s claim they are a “combatant” or likely to engage in a violent act in the future.
 
If Congress approves Obama’s categories of people likely to engage in violent acts, overnight millions of lawful U.S. activists could be subject to Indefinite Prolonged Detention. When you examine Obama’s speech, it appears Obama wants retroactive power to incarcerate anyone government claims (prior) supported violent acts on the premise, that person is likely to engage in violent acts in the future: U.S. activists would be vulnerable because no activist can control what other activists or groups might do illegally they network with domestically or overseas. Government would only have to claim a person; group or organization might commit a violent act in the future to order Preventative Detention of lawful participants with no evidence whatsoever. Americans would be afraid to speak out. 

It is foreseeable any “individual” who writes on the Internet or verbally express an opinion against or entity of U.S. Government or its coalition partners could be deemed a “Combatant” or likely to engage in or cause violent acts: government too easily could claim an author’s writings inspired people in the past and will in the future commit violent acts. It is problematic that indefinitely detained U.S. Citizens not involved in terrorism or hostile activities, not given Miranda Warnings or allowed legal counsel; interrogated, will be prosecuted for ordinary crimes because of their alleged admissions while held in indefinite “Prolonged Detention.” 

Obama wants the power to override the U.S. Constitution. Obama wants the power to detain indefinitely without probable cause or evidence, any U.S. Citizen based on conjecture someone might do something violent in the future.

Obama similar to Hitler is centralizing power in the federal Government by getting passed legislation that U.S. government potentially could use to intimidate and threaten businesses and corporations among others. Hitler got similar laws passed shortly before the burning of the German Parliament building blamed on the communists. Immediately after the fire, Hitler used his new laws to coerce corporations and others to support passage of fascist legislation that suspended provisions of the German Constitution that protected Citizens freedoms and civil liberties. Obama is now approaching a position where he can use similar new laws, including the Patriot Act and 200 asset forfeiture laws to seize any corporation or individual’s assets, force corporations and other institutions to support legislation that threatens or curtails the rights of Americans. This President not only intends to void the U.S. Constitution he is numb to the Majority Will of the American People.

DECREE OF THE REICH PRESIDENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE PEOPLE AND STATE

Note: Based on translations by State Department, National Socialism, 1942 PP. 215-17, and Pollak, J.K., and Heneman, H.J., The Hitler Decrees, (1934), pp. 10-11.7

In virtue of Section 48 (2) of the German Constitution, the following is decreed as a defensive measure against Communist acts of Violence, endangering the state:

Section 1
Sections 114, 115, 117, 118, 123, 124, and 153 of the Constitution of the German Reich are suspended until further notice. Thus, restrictions on personal liberty, on the right of free expression of opinion, including freedom of the press, on the right of assembly and the right of association, and violations of the privacy of postal, telegraphic, and telephonic communications, and warrants for house-searches, orders for confiscations as well as restrictions on property, are also permissible beyond the legal limits otherwise prescribed.

Section 2
If in a state the measures necessary for the restoration of public security and order are not taken, the Reich Government may temporarily take over the powers of the highest state authority.

Section 4
Whoever provokes, or appeals for or incites to the disobedience of the orders given out by the supreme state authorities or the authorities subject to then for the execution of this decree, or the orders given by the Reich Government according to Section 2, is punishable—insofar as the deed, is not covered by the decree with more severe punishment and with imprisonment of not less that one month, or with a fine from 150 up to 15,000 Reichsmarks.

Whoever endangers human life by violating Section 1, is to be punished by sentence to a penitentiary, under mitigating circumstances with imprisonment of not less than six months and, when violation causes the death of a person, with death, under mitigating circumstances with a penitentiary sentence of not less that two years. In addition the sentence my include confiscation of property.

Whoever provokes an inciter to or act contrary to public welfare is to be punished with a penitentiary sentence, under mitigating circumstances, with imprisonment of not less than three months.

Section 5
The crimes which under the Criminal Code are punishable with penitentiary for life are to be punished with death: i.e., in Sections 81 (high treason), 229 (poisoning), 306 (arson), 311 (explosion), 312 (floods), 315, paragraph 2 (damage to railroad properties, 324 (general poisoning).

Insofar as a more severe punishment has not been previously provided for, the following are punishable with death or with life imprisonment or with imprisonment not to exceed 15 years:

1. Anyone who undertakes to kill the Reich President or a member or a commissioner of the Reich Government or of a state government, or provokes to such a killing, or agrees to commit it, or accepts such an offer, or conspires with another for such a murder;

2. Anyone who under Section 115 (2) of the Criminal Code (serious rioting) or of Section 125 (2) of the Criminal Code (serious disturbance of the peace) commits the act with arms or cooperates consciously and intentionally with an armed person;

3. Anyone who commits a kidnapping under Section 239 of the Criminal with the intention of making use of the kidnapped person as a hostage in the political struggle.

Section 6
This decree enters in force on the day of its promulgation.

Reich President 
Reich Chancellor 
Reich Minister of the Interior 
Reich Minister of Justice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could Obama Be America’s First Defacto President?</p>
<p>Innocent Americans increasingly are sent to prison based on false evidence manufactured by police forensic crime labs. Now President Obama wants the power to incarcerate U.S. Citizens not on evidence, but for what they might do.    </p>
<p>Compare: Two days after the 1933 burning of Germany’s Parliament Building, blamed on communists, Hitler responded with a powerful speech before Parliament. Hitler asked Parliament to suspend sections of the Reich Constitution that protected Citizens&#8217; Rights and Civil Liberties. Hitler said the suspension was necessary so government could protect the homeland from being destroyed by communists. Hitler promised Parliament the Constitution would later be restored. After Parliament passed Hitler’s Discriminatory Decrees and Hitler signed it February 28, 1933, Hitler immediately used the news laws to abolished Parliament. See Hitler’s 1933 Discriminatory Laws below:</p>
<p>Obama gave a speech in May 2010, that proposed incarcerating in indefinite prolonged detention without evidence, any person government deemed a “combatant” or likely to engage in a violent act in the future; that would include U.S. Citizens “without evidence of wrongdoing.” With that amount power Obama could like Hitler arrest members of Congress, drag U.S. Citizens off the street and from their homes to be imprisoned indefinitely based only on Government’s claim they are a “combatant” or likely to engage in a violent act in the future.</p>
<p>If Congress approves Obama’s categories of people likely to engage in violent acts, overnight millions of lawful U.S. activists could be subject to Indefinite Prolonged Detention. When you examine Obama’s speech, it appears Obama wants retroactive power to incarcerate anyone government claims (prior) supported violent acts on the premise, that person is likely to engage in violent acts in the future: U.S. activists would be vulnerable because no activist can control what other activists or groups might do illegally they network with domestically or overseas. Government would only have to claim a person; group or organization might commit a violent act in the future to order Preventative Detention of lawful participants with no evidence whatsoever. Americans would be afraid to speak out. </p>
<p>It is foreseeable any “individual” who writes on the Internet or verbally express an opinion against or entity of U.S. Government or its coalition partners could be deemed a “Combatant” or likely to engage in or cause violent acts: government too easily could claim an author’s writings inspired people in the past and will in the future commit violent acts. It is problematic that indefinitely detained U.S. Citizens not involved in terrorism or hostile activities, not given Miranda Warnings or allowed legal counsel; interrogated, will be prosecuted for ordinary crimes because of their alleged admissions while held in indefinite “Prolonged Detention.” </p>
<p>Obama wants the power to override the U.S. Constitution. Obama wants the power to detain indefinitely without probable cause or evidence, any U.S. Citizen based on conjecture someone might do something violent in the future.</p>
<p>Obama similar to Hitler is centralizing power in the federal Government by getting passed legislation that U.S. government potentially could use to intimidate and threaten businesses and corporations among others. Hitler got similar laws passed shortly before the burning of the German Parliament building blamed on the communists. Immediately after the fire, Hitler used his new laws to coerce corporations and others to support passage of fascist legislation that suspended provisions of the German Constitution that protected Citizens freedoms and civil liberties. Obama is now approaching a position where he can use similar new laws, including the Patriot Act and 200 asset forfeiture laws to seize any corporation or individual’s assets, force corporations and other institutions to support legislation that threatens or curtails the rights of Americans. This President not only intends to void the U.S. Constitution he is numb to the Majority Will of the American People.</p>
<p>DECREE OF THE REICH PRESIDENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE PEOPLE AND STATE</p>
<p>Note: Based on translations by State Department, National Socialism, 1942 PP. 215-17, and Pollak, J.K., and Heneman, H.J., The Hitler Decrees, (1934), pp. 10-11.7</p>
<p>In virtue of Section 48 (2) of the German Constitution, the following is decreed as a defensive measure against Communist acts of Violence, endangering the state:</p>
<p>Section 1<br />
Sections 114, 115, 117, 118, 123, 124, and 153 of the Constitution of the German Reich are suspended until further notice. Thus, restrictions on personal liberty, on the right of free expression of opinion, including freedom of the press, on the right of assembly and the right of association, and violations of the privacy of postal, telegraphic, and telephonic communications, and warrants for house-searches, orders for confiscations as well as restrictions on property, are also permissible beyond the legal limits otherwise prescribed.</p>
<p>Section 2<br />
If in a state the measures necessary for the restoration of public security and order are not taken, the Reich Government may temporarily take over the powers of the highest state authority.</p>
<p>Section 4<br />
Whoever provokes, or appeals for or incites to the disobedience of the orders given out by the supreme state authorities or the authorities subject to then for the execution of this decree, or the orders given by the Reich Government according to Section 2, is punishable—insofar as the deed, is not covered by the decree with more severe punishment and with imprisonment of not less that one month, or with a fine from 150 up to 15,000 Reichsmarks.</p>
<p>Whoever endangers human life by violating Section 1, is to be punished by sentence to a penitentiary, under mitigating circumstances with imprisonment of not less than six months and, when violation causes the death of a person, with death, under mitigating circumstances with a penitentiary sentence of not less that two years. In addition the sentence my include confiscation of property.</p>
<p>Whoever provokes an inciter to or act contrary to public welfare is to be punished with a penitentiary sentence, under mitigating circumstances, with imprisonment of not less than three months.</p>
<p>Section 5<br />
The crimes which under the Criminal Code are punishable with penitentiary for life are to be punished with death: i.e., in Sections 81 (high treason), 229 (poisoning), 306 (arson), 311 (explosion), 312 (floods), 315, paragraph 2 (damage to railroad properties, 324 (general poisoning).</p>
<p>Insofar as a more severe punishment has not been previously provided for, the following are punishable with death or with life imprisonment or with imprisonment not to exceed 15 years:</p>
<p>1. Anyone who undertakes to kill the Reich President or a member or a commissioner of the Reich Government or of a state government, or provokes to such a killing, or agrees to commit it, or accepts such an offer, or conspires with another for such a murder;</p>
<p>2. Anyone who under Section 115 (2) of the Criminal Code (serious rioting) or of Section 125 (2) of the Criminal Code (serious disturbance of the peace) commits the act with arms or cooperates consciously and intentionally with an armed person;</p>
<p>3. Anyone who commits a kidnapping under Section 239 of the Criminal with the intention of making use of the kidnapped person as a hostage in the political struggle.</p>
<p>Section 6<br />
This decree enters in force on the day of its promulgation.</p>
<p>Reich President<br />
Reich Chancellor<br />
Reich Minister of the Interior<br />
Reich Minister of Justice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://www.usofearth.com/tp/?p=123&#038;cpage=1#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usofearth.com/tp/?p=123#comment-310</guid>
		<description>Obama is a dual citizen by admission, so he cannot be a natural born citizen as per Article II. He should not have been allowed to take office. The coup occured when he took office, why are we surprised when he takes it to the next level, Fascism? First he went after  Article II section 5,and we allowed him, now it is Article 1, section 7. When ANY part of the Constitution is attacked, no part is safe. Wise up America, the whole &quot;Birther&quot; issue is a misdirection, we have Constitutional crisis on our hands, a coup, an issue that is greatly valid and urgent in the extreme. How can our leader and Commander in Chief be a dual citizen with divided loyality? Who does he have allegiance to? The only dual citizens Presidents ever be Constitutionally qualified were 10 of the founding Presidents who were were allowed an exception to the natural born citizen clause in Article II through the grandfather clause. For Obama this exception cannot apply because the Grandfather clause has expired. So he is not Constitutionally qualified, he is &quot;acting as President&quot; without actually &quot;being&quot; President and it shows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is a dual citizen by admission, so he cannot be a natural born citizen as per Article II. He should not have been allowed to take office. The coup occured when he took office, why are we surprised when he takes it to the next level, Fascism? First he went after  Article II section 5,and we allowed him, now it is Article 1, section 7. When ANY part of the Constitution is attacked, no part is safe. Wise up America, the whole &#8220;Birther&#8221; issue is a misdirection, we have Constitutional crisis on our hands, a coup, an issue that is greatly valid and urgent in the extreme. How can our leader and Commander in Chief be a dual citizen with divided loyality? Who does he have allegiance to? The only dual citizens Presidents ever be Constitutionally qualified were 10 of the founding Presidents who were were allowed an exception to the natural born citizen clause in Article II through the grandfather clause. For Obama this exception cannot apply because the Grandfather clause has expired. So he is not Constitutionally qualified, he is &#8220;acting as President&#8221; without actually &#8220;being&#8221; President and it shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: txstarone</title>
		<link>http://www.usofearth.com/tp/?p=123&#038;cpage=1#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>txstarone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usofearth.com/tp/?p=123#comment-281</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m tired of social unconcitutional obamacare and big spending making elgible worker&#039;s and grandchildren to pay big taxes for years.tankyou.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m tired of social unconcitutional obamacare and big spending making elgible worker&#8217;s and grandchildren to pay big taxes for years.tankyou.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It Begins: The Red Coats Are Really Coming And It Is 2010! : tp</title>
		<link>http://www.usofearth.com/tp/?p=123&#038;cpage=1#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>It Begins: The Red Coats Are Really Coming And It Is 2010! : tp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usofearth.com/tp/?p=123#comment-255</guid>
		<description>[...] Dictatorship by Pelosi, Reid and Obama? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dictatorship by Pelosi, Reid and Obama? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An American Dictatorship by 2012 : tp</title>
		<link>http://www.usofearth.com/tp/?p=123&#038;cpage=1#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>An American Dictatorship by 2012 : tp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usofearth.com/tp/?p=123#comment-50</guid>
		<description>[...] Dictatorship by Pelosi, Reid and Obama? &#8211; A be sure to listen to Mark Levin explain how we are... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dictatorship by Pelosi, Reid and Obama? &#8211; A be sure to listen to Mark Levin explain how we are&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: If They Destroy The Constitution This Week : tp</title>
		<link>http://www.usofearth.com/tp/?p=123&#038;cpage=1#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>If They Destroy The Constitution This Week : tp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usofearth.com/tp/?p=123#comment-49</guid>
		<description>[...] those of you who know not what we are speaking of see Dictatorship by Pelosi, Reid and Obama? and be sure to listen to Mark Levin&#8217;s audio on the YouTube video on that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] those of you who know not what we are speaking of see Dictatorship by Pelosi, Reid and Obama? and be sure to listen to Mark Levin&#8217;s audio on the YouTube video on that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More On The Slaughter Rule &#124; RedState</title>
		<link>http://www.usofearth.com/tp/?p=123&#038;cpage=1#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>More On The Slaughter Rule &#124; RedState</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usofearth.com/tp/?p=123#comment-26</guid>
		<description>[...] Levin calls for the expulsion of Louise Slaughter from Congress for blatant violation and willfully ignoring of the Constitution (via the United States of Earth): [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Levin calls for the expulsion of Louise Slaughter from Congress for blatant violation and willfully ignoring of the Constitution (via the United States of Earth): [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.usofearth.com/tp/?p=123&#038;cpage=1#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usofearth.com/tp/?p=123#comment-25</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by tpgow: RT @KatyinIndy: 90 plus million armed Americans will not tolerate a dictatorship in any form here in America http://is.gd/avdYY #tcot #gop #ftrs #sgp #tlot...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by tpgow: RT @KatyinIndy: 90 plus million armed Americans will not tolerate a dictatorship in any form here in America <a href="http://is.gd/avdYY" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/avdYY</a> #tcot #gop #ftrs #sgp #tlot&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TwittLink - Your headlines on Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.usofearth.com/tp/?p=123&#038;cpage=1#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>TwittLink - Your headlines on Twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usofearth.com/tp/?p=123#comment-24</guid>
		<description>[...] Tweets about this great post on TwittLink.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tweets about this great post on TwittLink.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More On The Slaughter Rule &#171; The Underground Conservative</title>
		<link>http://www.usofearth.com/tp/?p=123&#038;cpage=1#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>More On The Slaughter Rule &#171; The Underground Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usofearth.com/tp/?p=123#comment-23</guid>
		<description>[...] Levin calls for the expulsion of Louise Slaughter from Congress for blatant violation and willfully ignoring of the Constitution (via the United States of Earth): [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Levin calls for the expulsion of Louise Slaughter from Congress for blatant violation and willfully ignoring of the Constitution (via the United States of Earth): [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
